רפואת הפה והשיניים - עיתון ההסתדרות לרפואת שיניים בישראל - כרך ל"ז, גיליון מס' 3 אב תש"פ

References 01. Rey neke J P. E s s en t ials of o r t hognat hi c surger y 2nd ed 2010. Quin te s s ence publishing. Ch 1-3, 2003. 02. Proffit W, Fields HW, Sarver DM, Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. The Mosby Co. 2013. Chapter 19. 03. Sigerist HE, The Great Doctors – A Biographical History of Medicine. Dover Publications: NewYork, 1971. 04. Canguilhem G, The Normal and the Pathological. Zone Books: NewYork, 1991. 05. Margolis HI. The axial inclination of the mandibular incisors. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1943; 29: 571-594. 06. Speidel TD, Stoner MM. Variation of mandibular incisor axis in adult “normal ״ occlusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1943; 30: 536-542. 07. Noyes HJ, Rushing CH, Sims HA. The angle of axial inclination of human central incisor teeth. Angle Orthod 1943; 13:60-61. 08. Hixon EH. The Norm concept and cephalometry. American Journal of Orthodontics 1956; 42: 898-906. 09. Brodie AG. Does scientific investigation support the extraction of teeth in orthodontics? American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery 1944; 30: 444-460. 10. Vaden JL. The Tweed-Merrifield Philosophy. Semin Orthod 1996; 2: 237-240. 11. Merrifield LL. The dimensions of the denture: Back tobasics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped 1994; 106:535-542. 12. McNamara Jr. JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 449-468. 13. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46:721-735.

14. Steiner CC. Cephalometric for you and me. A J Orthod1952; 39: 729-755. 15. Andrews LF, Andrews WA. Syllabus of the Andrews Orthodontic philosophy. 8th ed. San Diego, Calif: Lawrence F Andrews 1999. 16. Po sni ck JC : O r t hognat hi c surger y : Principles & Practice. St Louis, MO, Elsevier, 2014. pp 360-369. 17. Andrews WA: AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:662-669. 18. Ghaleb N, Bouserhal J, Bassil-Nassif N. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination. Eur JOrthos 2011; 33:228-35. 19. SchlosserJB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped 2005; 127: 17-24. 20. Resnick CM, Kim S, Yorlets RR, Calabrese CE, Peacock ZS, Kaban LB. Evaluation of Andrews׳ Analysis as a predictor of ideal sagittal maxillary positioning in Orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76: 2169-2176. 21. Gunson M, Arnett W. Orthognathic virtual treatment planning for functional esthetic results. Semin Orthod 2019; 25: 230-247. 22. Lin X, Edwards SP. Changes in natural head position in response to mandibular advancement. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2017; 55: 471-475. 23. Cho D, Choi DS, Cha BK. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147: 747-754. 24. Gunson M, Arnett W. Three dimensional facial analysis and seven step cephalometric treatment planning, In: Girardot RA. Goal directed orthodontics 2013p. 207-232.

30

.3 ז, גיליון ״ פ, כרך ל ״ רפואת הפה והשיניים, אב תש